Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.crs4.it/jspui/handle/123456789/48
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPintus, Ruggeroen_US
dc.contributor.authorDulecha, Tinsae Gebrechristosen_US
dc.contributor.authorJaspe-Villanueva, Albertoen_US
dc.contributor.authorGiachetti, Andreaen_US
dc.contributor.authorCiortan, Irinaen_US
dc.contributor.authorGobbetti, Enricoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-17T12:27:58Z
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-09T17:07:56Z-
dc.date.available2018-10-17T12:27:58Z
dc.date.available2020-11-09T17:07:56Z-
dc.date.issued2018-11-
dc.identifier.urihttp://0.0.0.0/xmlui/handle/123456789/48-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.crs4.it/jspui/handle/123456789/48-
dc.description.abstractReflectance Transformation Imaging (RTI) is widely used to produce relightable models from multi-light image collections.These models are used for a variety of tasks in the Cultural Heritage field. In this work, we carry out an objective and sub-jective evaluation of RTI data visualization. We start from the acquisition of a series of objects with different geometry andappearance characteristics using a common dome-based configuration. We then transform the acquired data into relightablerepresentations using different approaches: PTM, HSH, and RBF. We then perform an objective error estimation by comparingground truth images with relighted ones in a leave-one-out framework using PSNR and SSIM error metrics. Moreover, we carryout a subjective investigation through perceptual experiments involving end users with a variety of backgrounds. Objective andsubjective tests are shown to behave consistently, and significant differences are found between the various methods. While theproposed analysis has been performed on three common and state-of-the-art RTI visualization methods, our approach is gen-eral enough to be extended and applied in the future to new developed multi-light processing pipelines and rendering solutions,to assess their numerical precision and accuracy, and their perceptual visual quality.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipTerms: "European Union (EU)" & "Horizon 2020" / Action: H2020-EU.3.6.3. - Reflective societies - cultural heritage and European identity / Acronym: Scan4Reco / Grant number: 665091
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEurographicsen_US
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/665091/EU/Scan4Reco/Scan4Reco/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectReflectance Transformation Imagingen_US
dc.subjectEvaluationen_US
dc.subjectDigital Heritageen_US
dc.subjectCultural Heritageen_US
dc.subjectEmpirical studies in visualizationen_US
dc.subjectVisual inspectionen_US
dc.subjectImage Representationsen_US
dc.titleObjective and Subjective Evaluation of Virtual Relighting from Reflectance Transformation Imaging Dataen_US
dc.typetexten_US
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypetext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-1786-7068-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-3899-308X-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-0541-1039-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-0831-2458-
Appears in Collections:CRS4 publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
paper1003_CRC.pdf"Main Article"4,86 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

3
checked on Nov 11, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.