Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://dspace.crs4.it/jspui/handle/1138/49
Title: | Prognostic Utility of the Gleason Grading System Revisions and Histopathological Factors Beyond Gleason Grade | Authors: | Zelic, Renata giunchi, francesca Fridfeldt, Jonna Carlsson, Jessica Davidsson, Sabina Lianas, Luca Mascia, Cecilia ZUGNA, DANIELA Molinaro, Luca Vincent, Per Henrik Zanetti, Gianluigi Andrén, Ove richiardi, lorenzo Akre, Olof Fiorentino, Michelangelo Pettersson, Andreas |
Affiliations: | Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden Pathology Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden Data-Intensive Computing Division, Center for Advanced Studies, Research and Development in Sardinia (CRS4), Pula, Italy Data-Intensive Computing Division, Center for Advanced Studies, Research and Development in Sardinia (CRS4), Pula, Italy Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, and CPO-Piemonte, Turin, Italy Division of Pathology, A.O. Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Turin, Italy Department of Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden KI, Sweden Data-Intensive Computing Division, Center for Advanced Studies, Research and Development in Sardinia (CRS4), Pula, Italy Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, and CPO-Piemonte, Turin, Italy Department of Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden KI, Sweden Pathology Service, Maggiore Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden |
Editors: | Ehrenstein, Vera | Editors' affiliations: | Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University, Denmark | Keywords: | prostate cancer;prognosis;prognostic markers;Gleason score;virtual microscopy;histopathology | Issue Date: | 18-Jan-2022 | Publisher: | Dove Press | Project: | Deep-Learning and HPC to Boost Biomedical Applications for Health DIFRA |
Journal: | Clinical Epidemiology | Volume: | 2022:14 | Start page: | 59 | End page: | 70 | Abstract: | Background The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) revised the Gleason system in 2005 and 2014. The impact of these changes on prostate cancer (PCa) prognostication remains unclear. Objective To evaluate if the ISUP 2014 Gleason score (GS) predicts PCa death better than the pre-2005 GS, and if additional histopathological information can further improve PCa death prediction. Patients and Methods We conducted a case–control study nested among men in the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden diagnosed with non-metastatic PCa 1998–2015. We included 369 men who died from PCa (cases) and 369 men who did not (controls). Two uro-pathologists centrally re-reviewed biopsy ISUP 2014 Gleason grading, poorly formed glands, cribriform pattern, comedonecrosis, perineural invasion, intraductal, ductal and mucinous carcinoma, percentage Gleason 4, inflammation, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and post-atrophic hyperplasia. Pre-2005 GS was back-transformed using i) information on cribriform pattern and/or poorly formed glands and ii) the diagnostic GS from the registry. Models were developed using Firth logistic regression and compared in terms of discrimination (AUC). Results The ISUP 2014 GS (AUC = 0.808) performed better than the pre-2005 GS when back-transformed using only cribriform pattern (AUC = 0.785) or both cribriform and poorly formed glands (AUC = 0.792), but not when back-transformed using only poorly formed glands (AUC = 0.800). Similarly, the ISUP 2014 GS performed better than the diagnostic GS (AUC = 0.808 vs 0.781). Comedonecrosis (AUC = 0.811), HGPIN (AUC = 0.810) and number of cores with ≥50% cancer (AUC = 0.810) predicted PCa death independently of the ISUP 2014 GS. Conclusion The Gleason Grading revisions have improved PCa death prediction, likely due to classifying cribriform patterns, rather than poorly formed glands, as Gleason 4. Comedonecrosis, HGPIN and number of cores with ≥50% cancer further improve PCa death discrimination slightly. |
URI: | https://dspace.crs4.it/jspui/handle/1138/49 | DOI: | 10.2147/CLEP.S339140 |
Appears in Collections: | CRS4 publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
CLEP-339140-prognostic-utility-of-the-gleason-grading-system-revisions-a.pdf | 1,27 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.